-
Editorials
- Bradenton Herald
- Daytona Beach News-Journal
- Florida Times-Union
- Florida Today
- Ft. Myers News-Press
- Gainesville Sun
- Lakeland Ledger
- Miami Herald
- Naples Daily News
- NWF Daily News
- Ocala Star-Banner
- Orlando Sentinel
- Palm Beach Post
- Pensacola News Journal
- Sarasota Herald-Tribune
- TCPalm
- Sun-Sentinel
- Tallahassee Democrat
- Tampa Bay Times
- Columnists
- Cartoons
-
Press Releases
- Sayfie Review
- FL Speaker of the House
- FL Agriculture Commissioner
- FL Senate President
- FL Governor
- US Senator Rubio
- FL Attorney General
- US Senator
- FL CFO
- Congressional Delegation ≻
- Matt Gaetz
- Neal Dunn
- Kat Cammack
- Aaron Bean
- John Rutherford
- Michael Waltz
- Cory Mills
- Bill Posey
- Darren Soto
- Maxwell Frost
- Daniel Webster
- Gus Bilirakis
- Anna Paulina Luna
- Kathy Castor
- Laurel Lee
- Vern Buchanan
- Greg Steube
- Scott Franklin
- Byron Donalds
- Sheila Cherfilus McCormick
- Brian Mast
- Lois Frankel
- Jared Moskowitz
- Frederica Wilson
- Debbie Wasserman Schultz
- Mario Diaz-Balart
- Maria Elvira Salazar
- Carlos Gimenez
- Political Links
-
News Links
- Drudge Report
- NewsMax.com
- AP Florida News
- ABC News' The Note
- NBC News' First Read
- Florida Channel
- Florida TV Stations
- Florida Radio Stations
- Capitol Update
- Florida Newspapers
- Florida Trend
- South Florida Business Journal
- Tampa Bay Business Journal
- Orlando Business Journal
- Jacksonville Business Journal
- News Service of Florida
- Politico Playbook
- Washington Post The Daily 202
-
Research
- Florida Fiscal Portal
- Search Florida Laws
- Search House Bills
- Search Senate Bills
- Search County, City Laws
- Search County Clerks' Records
- Cabinet Agendas, Transcripts
- Search Executive Orders
- Search Atty. General Opinions
- Search Supreme Court Docket
- Florida Supreme Court Rulings
- Search Florida Corporations
- Search Administrative Rules
- Proposed Administrative Rules
- View Advertised Contracts
- Refdesk.com
- Government Services Guide
- Electoral Vote Map
-
Reference
- Florida House
- Florida Senate
- Find Your Congressman
- Find Your State Legislator
- Find Your Local Officials
- Find Government Phone #'s
- Florida Agencies
- Florida Cities
- Florida Counties
- Florida Universities
- County Tax Collectors
- County Property Appraisers
- County Clerks of Court
- County Elections Supervisors
- MyFlorida.com
- OPPAGA
Sun-Sentinel: A Christmas classic: Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus | Editorial
Herald: Taking away the dream of a college education from Dreamers is cruel | Opinion
Sun-Sentinel: The hole deepens in Delray's code enforcement division | Editorial
Sun-Sentinel: Proposed bear hunt isn't only threat to beloved species | Editorial
Sun-Sentinel: Shaker Village bailout looks like a done deal — and still a bad one | Editorial
Herald: Two mysteries remain unsolved after Trump's Mar-a-Lago press conference | Opinion
Herald: Buildings are sinking in Miami-Dade, and we have a lot of questions | Opinion
Herald: Biden couldn't sell a Haiti intervention. Trump can, and should | Opinion
Sun-Sentinel: Sen. Lara Trump would be the worst kind of nepotism | Editorial
Seminole Tribe challenges water standards
By JIM SAUNDERS
THE NEWS SERVICE OF FLORIDA
THE CAPITAL, TALLAHASSEE, August 9, 2016.......... The Seminole Tribe of Florida has filed a legal challenge against controversial new state water-quality standards, arguing they don't adequately take into account the amount of fish and other wildlife eaten by tribal members.
The tribe filed the challenge Monday in the state Division of Administrative Hearings, about two weeks after the state Environmental Regulation Commission narrowly approved the standards over the objections of environmentalists. The standards, developed by the Department of Environmental Protection, involve new and revised limits on chemicals in waterways.
But in the legal challenge, the Seminole Tribe said the standards don't adequately take into consideration potential health effects for people who eat fish on a "subsistence basis."
"The proposed rule, which bases human health-based surface water quality standards off of a recreational level of consumption of fish, water fowl, frogs and other aquatic life and does not set standards that recognize and protect human consumption at a subsistence level, adversely affects the Seminole Tribe and its members who continue to exercise their customary and traditional hunting, fishing, trapping and frogging rights on millions of acres of lands and waters across South and Central Florida," the six-page challenge said.
The Department of Environmental Protection, however, tried to dispel such concerns before the Environmental Regulation Commission approved the standards July 26. In a lengthy explanation posted on its website July 25, the department said the criteria would protect people in the state.
"DEP's proposed criteria take into account how, and how much, Floridians eat seafood, drink, shower and swim, and set the limits necessary to protect Floridians from adverse health effects," the online post said. "The criteria consider a range of environmental variables and account for the most at-risk populations, including young children, pregnant women and those whose diets comprise primarily of Florida seafood."
The challenge, filed against the Department of Environmental Protection and the Environmental Regulation Commission, was assigned to Administrative Law Judge Bram D.E. Canter.
The Environmental Regulation Commission, which is appointed by Gov. Rick Scott, voted 3-2 to approve the first changes in the water-quality standards in nearly a quarter century. The Department of Environmental Protection said the plan, technically a proposed rule, would allow it to regulate more chemicals while updating standards for others.
But environmentalists argued that at least some of the changes would lead to degraded water quality. With the changes needing to go to the federal Environmental Protection Agency for review and approval, some congressional Democrats also sent a letter to the EPA expressing "serious concerns."
Attorneys for the Seminole Tribe are seeking a determination that the proposed rule is invalid, in part arguing it is "arbitrary and capricious, because it sets the criteria at levels that can be met and still cause serious human health impacts to members of the Seminole Tribe and other members of the population who consume fish on a subsistence basis."